Cianciolo Argues Against Complacency
The first-term town councilor is running for re-election.
Jeff Cianciolo said he knows things are good in East Greenwich. He’s running for a second term on the Town Council to make sure they stay that way.
“I believe that I can continue to improve how the Town interacts with and delivers services to the taxpayers,” Cianciolo said in response to a questionnaire emailed to all the candidates. “Although East Greenwich residents already benefit from high-quality municipal services and the best school district in the state, we must not be complacent in looking to improve efficiencies and how we spend taxpayer dollars.”
For Cianciolo, consolidation – of both school and town functions and of the East Greenwich Fire District and the town – is of primary importance. As the councilman who put forward the idea of a nonbinding referendum on whether or not to merge the Fire District with the town, Cianciolo has been the idea’s main spokesman. And, too, he has argued against the tendency that can pit the schools against the town and he said the current good working relationship needs to be continued.
Cianciolo also believes town government should do a better job of being transparent. To that end, he said he will seek approval to pay the cost to videotape and post Town Council meetings online.
“For a nominal amount of money, we can make the meetings available to any who are interested,” he said.
As for whether or not East Greenwich has any services that should be eliminated or expanded, Cianciolo said no to both ideas.
“We should not be looking at expanding the role of our local government but should continue to focus on the core functions that are currently being provided and deliver those services efficiently,” he said.
He does think the Financial Town Meeting should be abolished. “The FTM is an anachronistic remnant of old New England whose utility has long since passed,” he said. “The FTM is now essentially a formality and should be eliminated.”
When asked why residents should vote for him, Cianciolo said:
“I am analytical and look at all sides of an issue prior to making decisions. I do not bring a special agenda or personal bias to office. My primary concern has and will continue to be to make decisions which are in the best interest of the taxpayers. As a business attorney, I advise businesses small and large every day on the matters that have a direct impact on the success or failure of a business. I bring this expertise and mindset to the position of Town Councilor.”
Jeff Cianciolo is one of six people seeking a term on the five-person Town Council. East Greenwich Patch will publish responses from the other candidates in coming days. To read Jeff Cianciolo's full questionnaire responses, click here.
To read about Brad Bishop, click here. To read about Michael Isaacs, click here. To read about Jean Ann Guliano, click here. To read about Mark Gee, click here. To read about Mike Kiernan, click here.
Stephen Bartlett
8:57 am on Friday, November 2, 2012
In my opinion, Cianciolo's stand on merging the Fire District in with the Town is just plain wrong. He does not recognize good governance when it's staring him in the face. In the 6 plus years I've served the taxpayers on the Fire Commission, I believe I've only seen Jeff one time at a Fire District monthly meeting and that was when the Planning Committee issued its report that there was no material savings in a merger with the Town. How does he know anything about the running of the Fire District if he hasn't been part of the process?
I have spoken frequently that the Town Council should look to regionalize like services with other area towns and cities rather than to attempt to build their own little empire. This is politics at it's worse.
There are at least three Town Councilors who favor the merger. I will withhold my vote from all three and I urge other voters to consider doing the same. They still will win because there is no substantial opposition, but I'll feel good about my vote and perhaps we can send them a message. I urge other voters to consider withholding their vote from Cianciolo, Gee and Isaacs.
Jeff Cianciolo
11:31 am on Friday, November 2, 2012
The public forum on the Fire District Merger which has been well covered by the local press (including the Patch http://eastgreenwich.patch.com/articles/2-visions-of-fire-district-at-forum-if-it-works-don-t-fix-it-archaic-and-closed). Those in favor and opposed to the Referendum gave informative presentations in what I think most people would agree was a collegial atmosphere without personal attacks. I encourage all voters to do their research and make an informed decision regardless of whether you have ever attended a Town Council or Fire District meeting.
I am not aware of any opportunity in recent history (or ever) where the voters had the opportunity to vote on anything related to the Fire District in a general election.
What a positive development for the East Greenwich voters…
Jeffrey Cianciolo
Old timer
11:01 pm on Friday, November 2, 2012
Positive development what a joke , he must have had his rose colored glasses on during the public forum. Everyone I met in Town over the last month didn't even know this was going to be on the ballet, well done Jeff you didnt get your way through committe so let's put it on as a non-binding refendum who's going to pay the freight and do the work " clarkin" right......