patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Repair Meadowbrook Floor For Good, Before It's Too Late

Did you know that the School Department spends $15,000 to $25,000 every year replacing failed sections of floor? That’s an expensive Band Aid.

 

Meadowbrook is wet. Very wet. At a joint meeting of the Building Committee and the School Committee last week, an engineering firm, SGH, hired by the School Department presented its findings from a yearlong study of Meadowbrook.

This nugget really caught my attention: in spring and fall Meadowbrook has 10 gallons of water per 1000 square feet. 10 gallons! Mr. Scheiner said 1 gallon is the norm.

I was also fascinated with some of the pictures he showed of the “fix” put in a few years back. I’m sure everybody meant well at the time but … it all had a certain “home made” look. I kept expecting to see a slide with a big ball of duct tape. Apparently, the pipes that were added to take moisture OUT to the roof are bringing it IN. That’s right adding more water to the wet floor, leading more sections of floor to fail.

Did you know that the School Department spends $15,000 to $25,000 every year replacing failed sections of floor? That’s an expensive Band Aid.

Have you seen the army of portable de-humidifiers that are moved from room to room? Cleaned, emptied, water mopped up. The janitors spend a lot of time chasing water.

And the floor is not the only one of many points of entry for all this water.

Mr Scheiner’s presentation was methodical in its structure. He would show photo documentation of a particular problem, followed by graphs illustrating it with scientific data then offer a solution. Very engineer-y. 

Mr. Scheiner and SGH say that taking out the vents, replacing the roof, putting in a new HVAC system, and replacing the floor will fix the moisture problem. Jon Winkur asked how long the building would be useful if these things were done and Mr. Scheiner said, “indefinitely” without hesitation.

At this point I should say that the meeting was opened with remarks from Jay Gowell, chair of the Building Committee. He wanted to clear up some rumors about possibly Meadowbrook closing. It’s NOT. We have 300 students housed there and none of our other school buildings can fit them. As a matter of fact, Jon Winkur said that enrollment at Meadowbrook would have to drop some 30% before we could even entertain the notion of putting these students in one of our existing buildings.

Right now $1.6 million of the 2008 school improvement bond is allocated for the Meadowbrook floor. The SGH recommendations will cost roughly 3 million. The additional $1.4 million could easily come out of the Cole surplus.

The Building Committee voted for the full fix.

They then asked members of the School Committee what they thought. It appears they are disinclined to do much more than what they are doing now — placing giant Band Aids over buckling floor tiles. Even though in 2008 we all rallied behind their School Improvement Bond with the promise of a new floor.

Suppose your roof is leaking. You don’t have $10,000 to fix it so you put down towels, and buckets every time it rains. Once a year you have to spend $1,000 on a new rug. It’s a pain to chase the drips from room to room, but what can you do? You have a guy who comes over to empty the buckets and wring out the towels so it’s not really your time being wasted. Oh, and you pay him.

Suddenly, you inherit $10,000 from Great Aunt Hilda. Would you fix the roof? Or would you do some other projects you have been meaning to get to? I would fix the roof.

It’s my house, I have to live here for a loooong time. Over the long term, water will ruin my house and I’ll have to move. I don’t want a big new mortgage in 15 or 20 years. I want to take care of my current investment. It seems the School Committee thinks the other projects are more important.

Do they plan on asking me to hold another sign outside Swift Gym in 2020? This time asking voters to issue a bond to replace Meadowbrook because it’s beyond repair.

Related Topics: School Committee

EG Lurker

10:21 am on Monday, January 17, 2011

I am all for repairing something that is causing harm to our children, our community, and our collective wallets, and we can debate and debate if there is a actual problem, as well as how much that problem may cost to fix in both the short and long terms. But the one imperative question I fail to see in each of these articles and opinion pieces is: what is the future of Meadowbrook?

As we move toward a middle school model in this town, our sixth graders will no longer be attending Eldridge and Hanaford, and the four lower elementary school will have fewer students. The town is preparing for the transition of the first 6th grade class, but I have heard little to no talk about how we transition the lower elementary schools into this new model. And talk around this subject must include a discussion on the potential reduction of our lower elementary schools from four to three. The fact that this conversation has not happened is not surprising, as this town - and as we are well aware - doesn't always think things through to the fullest.

The cost savings of maintaining three buildings vs. four is obvious, and when one of those buildings is going to potentially cost taxpayers upwards of $3 million, this conversation needs to happen sooner rather than later.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Heather Larkin

11:20 am on Monday, January 17, 2011

it is happening... the plan for Meadowbrook is for 3rd grade to move up to Hanaford and for Meadowbrook to expand to full day K and increase the pre-k program-not until the '12-'13 school year. Not sure if the same will happen with the Frenchtown/Eldridge model.

Comment_arrow

EG Lurker

12:42 pm on Monday, January 17, 2011

Heather - was this a school department decision? I have heard none of this, and as a parent in the Frenchtown/Eldridge model, I would expect both models to follow the same plan...

Comment_arrow

Heather Larkin

12:54 pm on Monday, January 17, 2011

I don't know if it's an official decision yet but that is what Victor Mercurio and Ron Areglado (MFS Principal) want to see happen. They have both spoken with the PTG about it.

EG Lurker

1:51 pm on Monday, January 17, 2011

I highly doubt this is an official decision, as I believe it's one in which the public (including non-Meadowbrook parents) should have a voice in. Neither the PTG, Areglado or Mercurio have decision making power on this subject - all are merely voices with an opinion to be heard.

I look forward to some heated to debate on this topic soon!

Reply

Christine King

4:40 pm on Monday, January 17, 2011

Thanks for bringing this issue to the attention of the district and tax payers beyond Meadowbrook. This is a critical time in which our school committee will either committ to fixing a building we already have or possibly committ the town of EG to another new school bond in the not so distant future.

Reply

Betsy Fenik

7:48 pm on Monday, January 17, 2011

More great work by the school committee and the town of EG. I seem to remember the Meadowbrook floor being a big issue several years ago. Then we have the HS gym floor and the playing fields. If I ran my business this way I'd be OUT of business, but since no one is ever held accountable for these fiascos we taxpayers just keep shelling out.

Reply

Amanda Barnes

11:26 am on Tuesday, January 18, 2011

We're wasting money and time on the band-aids we keeping placing on Meadowboork. The community of East Greenwich needs Meadowbrook Farms to educate and house our children. If we don't give MFS the full fix it needs to remedy its maladies and prevent further damage to the school, we are going to have to come up with an even more expensive solution to educate 300+ students. The problems at MFS have been found to be fixable and will bring longevity to the building. Let's listen to what the experts have said on how to finally fix the real problems at Meadowbrook and put the money toward those suggestions.

Reply

Camille Speca

7:14 pm on Tuesday, January 18, 2011

Heather, can you please elaborate on expanding the pre-K program at Meadowbrook? Is this program on the taxpayer's dime?

I do not see the need for expanding Meadowbook to complete full day K - it appears our students are doing extremely well in the model that is now in place - expanded K for those who need it.

Thank you.

Reply

Heather Larkin

3:46 pm on Wednesday, January 19, 2011

All I know is what I wrote earlier. My sense is that the idea is in the early stages and many details would need to be figured out. Someone asked if there was discussion around reconfiguring the lower elementary schools after the sixth grade moves up and yes, there is discussion. Stay tuned...

Reply

Leave a comment