Fuming Over Cigar Smoke & Why Not Profitable Billboards?

What to love and loathe about living in East Greenwich this week.

RANT: Straight out of the box I'll let you know that I don't like cigarettes. But then, I am an ex-smoker so it is practically mandatory for me to start hacking whenever I take in a lungful of second-hand smoke. Otherwise, I might remember how much I used to adore the joy that only a cup of coffee and that first cigarette in the morning can bring, the heady release of having a nicotine fit, the extra break from work and the camaraderie of going outside and hanging with other smokers, the sweet excuse for my innate grouchiness ... sorry, I digress.

The point is I was one of the happy campers when the smoking ban was enforced in East Greenwich bars and restaurants. And I was one of the outraged ones when the ban on lighting up at state beaches became voluntary as opposed to mandatory (that really works – I voluntarily opt to eat less ice cream on a daily basis but, gee, an addict’s gotta do what an addict’s gotta do).

This is all an unnecessarily long lead in to my real rant – after a day chained to the desk, my husband and I went for stroll and a breath of fresh air in Scalloptown Park the other night. Instead, we got caught in the noxious cloud of some guy’s cigar fumes.

I don’t think laws that snuff out public smoking are a swipe at personal freedom any more than prohibitions against drunk driving, littering or making too much noise are. You can't have sex in a public park, you usually can't drink booze in a public park, you can’t throw your garbage on the ground in a public park, you can’t blast your music on full amp speakers in a public park (you can’t even do that one in your backyard without a permit), you can't kill babies in a public park ... there are lots of things you can't do in public. The way I see it, do what you want in the privacy of your own home (except the music thing – if someone [read one of your nice neighbors] complains, you will be shut down and yes, I speak from personal experience here), but the only way a civilization can function as such – i.e., civilized – is to be mindful of those around you. “Personal freedom” is all well and good, but there is also such a thing as “public responsibility."

I know that state Rep Richard Morrison is working to extend the state law to include making smoking a no-no in public places. More power to him.

Now if someone would introduce a bill to limit cell phone use. Or at least tax people every time they say, “Can you hear me now?”

RAVE: So . Hello? This is a problem?

Okay, before you jump down my throat, I should say in the best of all possible worlds, I don’t want the signs either. But these are not utopian times, so why shouldn’t we get some hard cash for what we are already giving away for free? In the course of one day going from my house to downtown and over to the west side of Route 2, I have seen signs for pet grooming, mosquito control, Ron Paul, eggs for sale (mea culpa), driveway paving, snow removal (apparently jumping the gun for next season), Ron Paul again, summer camps, landscaping services, house painting companies, Ron Paul yet again (!), sailing classes, and yard sales that took place several months ago.

There is no reason that East Greenwich needs to look like Route 2 in Warwick. The decision could include final say on the look and content of the advertising and an out clause allowing the town to terminate the contract before the lease expires. I am sure there is some legal wording for this that makes it all kosher.

On the other hand, I guess we could just raise taxes to make some extra revenue for the town. That always works.

Carl I. Hoyer July 07, 2012 at 02:23 PM
I,too, am an ex-smoker and remember so very well being on the mid-watch (midnight to 4 AM) in the middle of the Pacific Ocean, enjoying butts and coffee. I also remember losing my bid for re-election to the Town Council for being 1 of 4 (out of 5 members) voting for an ordnance for segregating smokers in restaurants (75% of the public did NOT smoke at that time). Vindication came when it became state law. Several states ban smoking in public areas but not because of smoke but because of littering (butts, matchbooks,etc.). Tough to enforce, and probably isn't. I feel we have sign pollution; (e.g. why post signs saying speed is radar recorded?) and we don't need more, in the form of billboards. The "almighty dollar" should not be the reason AND, it defiles the countryside as well as being another distraction (which we don't need) along with cell phones,texting,drinking coffee,etc. while we drive. IF there is a public hearing on the matter, let the will of the majority rule, but my vote will be "no". 'nuff said!
skycat July 07, 2012 at 11:22 PM
Speaking of killing babies, it was the Pennsylvania Dept. of Health that didn't think it was any of its business what went on in a Philadelphia clinic where babies spines were snipped to stop them from breathing. This is the same Dept.of Health that makes it its business to enforce smoking bans in adults-only bars. It seems that something more than health concerns is behind the behavior of our government agencies. According to Rep. Morrison, "It's not just second-hand smoke that is a problem, although that is certainly a great concern," "There is also the problem of discarded cigarette butts, which children and birds might consume." Why, just the other day a bird tweeted me, asking if I had a match. Now I know why. Rhode Island's indoor ban at least had some justification in terms of death tolls, even if they were inflated, but the silence regarding outdoor secondhand smoke deaths suggests there is nothing there to inflate. Apparently, Rep. Morrison can't tell the difference between working in a smoky bar for 20 years and getting a whiff of smoke on a beach or in a park. According to The Natural Resources Defense Council, 3.5 million people are sickened by beach water every year, and Rep. Morrison is worried about cigarette butts? Seems like he ought to be banning swimming. Then again, that wouldn't be consistent with the Healthy People 2020 Tobacco Use federal government objectives for smoker behavior modification.
Carl Pallister July 08, 2012 at 03:21 AM
And who is going to pay for your utopian society?? Oh that's right we can just raise taxes...with the fiscal realities coming down all around us, when the nanny state starts using scarce and precious resources on such trivial things it is time to start slashing budgets even deeper.
Ted Kaiser July 19, 2012 at 07:13 PM
I'm always impressed with impulsive complaining about issues that affect very few people... neglecting huge problems that fill our hospitals everyday. Let's start addressing obesity, sugar consumption, inactivity and the direct correlation with heart disease, diabetes, and numerous other complex health problems. What's worse...seeing/smelling a guy smoking a cigar or parents with obese kids at the beach chowing down a box of Allie's donuts with a liter of Mountain Dew? Or if we're going to talk about smoke, let's address E.G.'s dirty little secret: the rampant use of pot, booze, and other recreational drugs in our teen/20's population...


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »