Tuesday, November 13, 2012
Voters approved the nonbinding ballot referendum asking if the Town and the Fire District should merge by an overwhelming majority on Tuesday – 4,425 to 2,239.
Officials are pondering how to move forward after voters Tuesday approved the idea of merging the EG Fire District with the Town. The ballot question was not binding, since by state law any such change needs to be made by the General Assembly. Three of the five Fire Commissioners came out against merging the District with the Town, including board Chairman Bill Daly. “We didn’t really get the chance to get the word out,” he said. Still, said Daly, “we’re going to cooperate. I think we’ll present our point of view.” Town Manager Bill Sequino said the referendum passed “more overwhelming” than he he thought it would. As for what to do now, Sequino said, “I think the Council and the Fire District should get together.” Sequino said many …
Tuesday, November 6, 2012
Updates on local elections will be posted here throughout the day. Connect with us on Twitter at @egpatch or our FB page.
7:30 p.m. While most of the polling stations were considerably calmer by 6:30 p.m., Cole was the exception, where there were maybe 60 voters in line, 50 of them in the A-L line, 10 in the M-Z. Apparently, that was the story all day at Cole. Lots more A-Ls in that precinct than M-Zs. Strange. So the big question of the day was why was the high school so much slower than the other four polling stations. As Town Canvasser Elaine Vespia explained, the high school was the poll for voters who live in R.I. Senate Dist. 33, now only a small corner of the town. Dist. 33 is mostly in Coventry and the two men running for the Senate seat, incumbent Glen Shibley (R) and Lou Raptakis (D), are both Coventry residents. It's not that the high school was …
Monday, November 5, 2012
Bill Daly chairs the EG Fire District Board of Commissioners.
On Nov. 6 the voters of East Greenwich, in a non-binding referendum, will be asked the question of whether they want the East Greenwich Fire District to cease to exist and become a Fire Department within the Town. The answer to this question should be NO for the following reasons. It is universally agreed that the East Greenwich Fire District has been providing excellent service to the East Greenwich community since 1797, 215 years. The firefighters have performed admirably over the years and are highly regarded in our Town. There is no need to change. The Fire District is financially well managed by the Board of Fire Commissioners and does not have one penny of debt. All the independent financial audits have been excellent. The Fire …
Friday, October 19, 2012
Some outtakes from Monday's forum with the Town Council and the Fire Commissioners on whether merging fire service with the town is the way to go.
They met, they discussed, and, for the most part, anyway, they disagreed at Monday night's forum on the Fire District and whether or not it should be merged with the town. Four out of five Town Council members favor the nonbinding ballot referendum promoting a merger. Three out of five Fire Commissioners are strongly against that idea. They met Monday with the public to discuss. About 30 residents came out for the forum. The video here features Town Councilor Jeff Cianciolo and a handful of citizen speakers.
Thursday, October 18, 2012
About 30 residents turned out to hear members of the Town Council and Fire Commissioners make their case for or against the nonbinding ballot question about merging FD with the town, and to ask questions of their own.
The forum Monday night hosted by the Town Council and the Fire District Commissioners brought out two different visions of the future of fire service for the town, with members of both panels on both sides of the issue. The forum was held to explore the nonbinding referendum question that will appear on the Nov. 6 ballot: Are you in favor of merging the East Greenwich Fire District into the Town of East Greenwich, the result of which would be that the Town would maintain a municipal fire department and the separate Fire District would cease to exist? Town Councilor Jeff Cianciolo – the one who proposed the idea of the ballot question in July – spoke first. "This town has two governments," he said. The Town of EG has a lengthy and …
Friday, October 12, 2012
The EGFD and Town Council will be on hand Monday night at Swift Community Center to talk about both sides of the issue.
East Greenwich residents have the opportunity to hear from East Greenwich Fire Commissioners and the Town Council on the non-binding referendum question that goes before voters on Nov. 6 which asks if the fire service should be merged with the town. The public forum takes place Monday at 7 p.m. at Swift Community Center. Residents are encouraged to come. The East Greenwich Fire District has always been a completely separate from the town. It is ruled by a five-member Fire Commission with independent taxing authority. Town Councilman Jeff Cianciolo raised the issue of placing a nonbinding referendum question before voters during a Council meeting in July. Cianciolo said he wanted to hear what citizens thought about having two systems. “…
Wednesday, July 25, 2012
Town Council votes 3-1 in favor of putting the non-binding referendum on the ballot despite some vocal dissent.
After some heated discussion, the Town Council voted 3-1 to add a nonbinding referendum question to the November ballot that would ask voters if they thought the town and fire district should merge. Councilman Mike Kiernan voted against the plan. “The knee-jerk reaction is going to be, “Of course we should merge,” Kiernan said during the debate. “This question on its face is biased.… it doesn’t provide the detail needed.” “Why do we have two separate, independent governments for a town of 13,000?” countered Cianciolo. “Placing this referendum on the ballot is, number one, an opportunity to educate the people about how their town runs. We’ll also get their opinion.” Fire Commissioner Chairman Steve Bartlett told council members the issue …
Bill Pett
2:14 pm on Monday, November 19, 2012
Alan Clarke and others who question the validity of the vote are on target. The referendum, which was non-binding anyway, therefore not to be taken altogether seriously, was really nothing more than authorizing the council and the district to discuss how it could be done. Once a plan is drawn up, it should be submitted to the taxpayers once again. more ›